shaocong.

Presently buggered hard by these questions:

1. Is self-defence just a species of duress and/or necessity? Can the defences of duress, necessity, and self-defence be assimilated within a unified defence of "necessary action"?

2. “Copying is de rigeur in the semiconductor industry, and as long as novel technologies are protected by the law of patents, there is no reason for the law to intervene with copyright and layout design of integrated circuits rights.” Do you agree? Discuss.

posted by Shaocong @ 2:33 PM